Posts Tagged ‘Cast Iron’

ZCMI: A Legacy Cast In Iron {GIVEAWAY}

Monday, January 16th, 2012 by Robert Baird

DVD Cover

The cast iron facade of Salt Lake City’s historic ZCMI store has symbolized pioneering commerce and economic vitality on Main Street for more than 135 years.  The Zion’s Co-operative Mercantile Institution retail enterprise, founded in 1868, was one of the first department stores in America. The ZCMI store was also the only department store to be owned by a religious organization, namely The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, until it was sold in 1999 to The May Department Stores Company, now known  as Macy’s, Inc.

The ZCMI cast iron facade was the largest of its kind in Utah.  In a 1973 store expansion, this beloved facade was slated for demolition.  Concerned patrons led a call for preservation and insisted it be restored as a downtown landmark.  Restoration architect Steven T. Baird was hired to develop the protocol for this first major cast iron restoration in the country.  Present-day restoration methods and procedures for cast iron architecture are a credit to his tireless efforts.

Continuing the legacy of their father, Steven T. Baird’s sons’ company, Historical Arts & Casting, Inc., was commissioned in 2007 by City Creek Reserve, Inc.,  to preserve this historic landmark as part of the City Creek project, a broad, mixed-use redevelopment of downtown Salt Lake.  The second major restoration of the ZCMI facade was completed in June 2011.

The Documentary, ZCMI: A Legacy Cast In Iron was produced by Robert A. Baird, Vice President of Operations at Historical Arts & Casting, and was beautifully filmed and edited by Steven McCurdy of Creative Light Productions.  It was created with the spirit of tradition that is found in the heart of Historical Arts & Casting, Inc.  It was also a tribute to the tireless efforts and sharp eye of Steven T. Baird, who passed away a month after the premiere of the documentary in Salt Lake City, Utah.  This documentary is dedicated to him.

Purchase price: $20.00 + Shipping and Handling

To purchase contact our staff: info@historicalarts.com

or

1-800-225-1414

________________________________________________

GIVEAWAY!!

We are hosting a giveaway on our Facebook page that will close on Friday, January 20th @ 5:00 pm (MST).  If you would like to enter to win the documentary and a miniature version of the lion head ornament found on the ZCMI city facade go to our Facebook page, like us and make a comment on our posting about the release of the documentary give away.  We will let you know if you have won and we will ship the package directly to you.

facebookgraphic

We are also starting a weekly email newsletter.  If you are interested in receiving it please email our marketing team at info@historicalarts.com.

Grand Opera House – Wilmington, DE (1986)

Tuesday, April 26th, 2011 by admin

Grand Opera House - Wilmington, DE - Cast Iron Facade Restoration

Grand Opera House - Wilmington, DE - Cast Iron Facade Restoration

On July 1, 1973 a festive parade led by a high school marching band and government leaders kicked off the restoration of the Grand Opera House (GOH) façade that was once the jewel of downtown Wilmington. The GOH searched the country to find architects capable of overseeing their new revitalization project.  They found Baird architects, in Salt Lake City, and signed a contract with GOH to provide their area of cast iron restoration.

The GOH was built and funded as part of the Masonic Temple in 1871. It quickly  became an object of civic pride showcasing Victorian grandeur and architecture. By 1968, after many stages of use, the GOH stood abandoned and neglected in the midst of the city.

Steven Baird,  preservation and cast-iron expert, had worked on a similar building in his native Salt Lake City.  He had refined the techniques of working with cast-iron and was thrilled to be awarded his first major cast-iron restoration project outside of Utah.  The first floor exterior of the restoration was completed for Wilmington’s  bi-centennial celebration in 1976.

Ten years later in 1986, Historical Arts and Casting received a curtain call to finish the restoration and painting of the GOH from the second floor to the roof. The project took two years to complete, restoring this beautiful Victorian theatre to a   place of prominence and culture in this Delaware community.

Restoring Cast Iron Facades – Part 2 of 2

Wednesday, June 9th, 2010 by Robert Baird

This article originally ran in the Traditional Building November 1989 edition.  Original author was Robert A. Baird, V.P. Operations at Historical Arts & Casting, Inc.

Alternative Materials

During a restoration, the question of alternative materials always comes up.  There are a few basic points to remember.  First, if an alternative is to be used, don’t forget that each metal has a different rate of thermal expansion.  Also, some metals, when in contact with each other, create and electrolytic action that can have tremendous consequences over an extended period of time.  These two limitations, if anticipated, can be overcome.

Grand Opera House - Wilmington, DE

Grand Opera House - Wilmington, DE

We use aluminum as an alternative for cast iron because it’s easy to work with.  Aluminum is about one-third the weight of iron, is easy to work-weld, is somewhat malleable, and can be cut with a Skil saw.  There is no visible difference between iron and aluminum after they are painted.  However, aluminum has roughly double the expansion rate of iron.  Aluminum expands up to 3/16” per foot over a 100-deg. temperature change, while iron expands approximately 3/32” per foot.

Using aluminum as a stand-alone system works extremely well.  Aluminum also works well for ornament applied to iron, such as brackets, dentils, column capitals and bases, etc.  However, we avoid using aluminum sandwiched between cast iron elements where expansion and contraction could create a problem.  For example, if one length of cornice needs to be replaced in a cast iron cornice system, or if one jamb needs to be replaced in a cast iron window system, cast iron should be used as the replacement material.

A good coat of paint is a sufficient electrolytic barrier between iron and aluminum for applied ornamentation.  Frequently, we also use silicone caulk and Teflon tape as barriers between different materials.

Another good alternative for cast iron is ductile iron, an iron alloy that is weldable.  We use this material on façade restorations where castings have to be welded during prefabrication, prior to installation.

Historically, cast iron was used to replicate stone and it is common to find during a paint analysis that the earliest coats of paint were light stone colors impregnated with sand and applied in very heavy coats.  Coating systems that we use today are extremely high tech; some even have to be applied by licensed applicators.  The best system for iron that we have worked with is manufactured by TNEMEC.

Former HACI employee Ed Flegal priming the column covers of the Woodward & Lathrop storefront - Washington D.C.

Former HACI employee Ed Flegal priming the column covers of the Woodward & Lathrop storefront - Washington D.C.

First, zinc-rich primers are applied.  Next, and intermediate epoxy primer is applied.  Finally, it’s finished off with polyurethane topcoats.  Because of the complex nature of these products, I would recommend discussing your project with a manufacturer’s representative.

Cast aluminum requires a different coating process from iron.  There are two systems we use for aluminum; one is an epoxy system manufactured by TNEMEC, and the other is a fluoropolymer system.

With the TNEMEC system, aluminum castings are cleaned, degreased and then coated with an epoxy primer.  A polyurethane topcoat is then applied and air-cured.

Fluoropolymer coatings such as PPG’s Duranar are popular in today’s building industry.  It is not uncommon to see product literature touting a 20-year guarantee for coatings of this type.  They have to be applied by licensed applicators and sample castings from each batch have to pass a 400-hr. test before warranties are issued.  There are a number of steps to closely follow when using this paint system. First, the castings must be thoroughly cleaned followed by an Aladine wash..  Castings are then baked at 400° F to evaporate all moisture and burn off gases trapped in the metal.  After degassing, the fluoropolymer coating is then applied and baked in an industrial oven.

One essential for fine cast detail is the quality of the pattern or tooling that is used to create the component during the foundry process.  Because both cast iron and aluminum shrink when changing from a fluid to a solid, patterns are made oversized.  Sometimes and original cast iron component can be used as the pattern to replicate an item.  However, one should expect a loss of detail and slight shrinkage in size from the original.  We frequently replicate small details from original castings, such as capital leaves, moldings, and brackets.  If large quantities are to be reproduced, it is more cost-effective to create a new pattern.  Patterns are always made when an item has to be fitted next to original pieces such as a cornice, column, or other major façade element.

Iron and aluminum both have their place and can work in harmony to breathe life back into old buildings.  Just use each material within its limits.  If you have additional questions on a project that involves restoration of iron, don’t hesitate to call an expert.

Part 1 of 2 found here.

Restoring Cast Iron Facades – Part 1 of 2

Thursday, June 3rd, 2010 by Robert Baird

This article originally ran in the Traditional Building November 1989 edition.  Original author was Robert A. Baird, V.P. Operations at Historical Arts & Casting, Inc.

In our preservation projects, we have spent countless hours discussing restoration practices for cast iron ornament with architects and contractors.  I thought it might be helpful to answer (in brief) some of the most frequently discussed topics.

Baltimore City Life Museum - Baltimore, MD

Baltimore City Life Museum - Baltimore, MD

Cast iron is a brittle, porous, high-carbon metal.  From an engineering standpoint, it has tremendous compression-loading capacity, but very poor tensile strength.  Its high carbon content makes it extremely difficult to weld.  Consequently, most cast iron ornament is mechanically fastened.

Reviewing the restoration of a typical cast iron façade is a good way to discuss various ways to stabilize and repair cast iron.

A Typical Façade Restoration

The first step is to remove deteriorated, loose or broken elements, and clean them.  Most cast iron façades are composed of repetitive elements connected by a series of clips, angles, and mechanical fasteners.  Disassembly is handled by using a cutting torch to burn the heads off fasteners.  Ornament is attached to the façade with countersunk flat-head machine bolts.  It can be tricky to locate these fasteners under several layers of paint, but they are there.  After removing the fasteners, iron elements are lifted or hoisted from the façade.

Duane Street - Lower Manhattan (Tribeca), NY

Duane Street - Lower Manhattan (Tribeca), NY

Cast iron can be cleaned on site or at a separate location.  For the most part, we have had best results with sandblasting.  Although the job is messy, the result is superior to chemical stripping.  The high-tech coatings we specify require that the metal be blast-cleaned to an SSPC-SP6 finish.

A cast iron façade can be scaffolded and enclosed with a plastic or canvas barrier to contain the blasting media and debris.  Manufacturers specify immediate application of primers after blasting to prevent any buildup of surface rust.  For an initial primer, we’ve had good success with TNEMEC-Zinc – a zinc-rich primer manufactured by TNEMEC Company.

Be aware that the paint you are removing most likely contains lead, so disposal of the blasting debris must be done according to Federal EPA regulations.  Attention to this detail requires a lot of paperwork, but we’ve found local Environmental Protection Agencies very helpful with lists of certified disposal sites and transporters of hazardous waste.

Cleaning large facades can be sequenced so that blasting and priming are accomplished daily until the cleaning phase is complete.  Regular inspections are vital during this phase so that problems that are uncovered can be treated and/or scheduled for repair.

Chemical strippers have their place; they are the only answer for interior and exterior spaces where blasting is not feasible.  There are several good products that do an adequate job with a little elbow grease.  A good scrubbing with a power wire wheel and degreasing are recommended following chemical stripping.

The major cause of deterioration in cast iron facades is the lack – or breakdown – of the waterproofing system.  When putting a façade back together, this is a critical issue.  The amount of time spent applying correct weatherproofing principles has a direct effect on the life expectancy of the restored building.  We recommend caulking all horizontal and vertical joints.  We use a paintable elastomeric caulk (Sikaflex) made by Sika Corp., Lyndhurst, N. J.  Sheet metal flashing is also an integral part of a good waterproofing system.

Over the past several years we have used fluid-applied polyurethane undercoating systems on the back and unexposed sides of iron.  More recently, we’re using expanding foams to fill the voids in hollow cast elements to eliminate condensation.

ZCMI Building - Salt Lake City, UT *This project is currently being restored again by Historical Arts & Casting to be placed in the City Creek Development.

ZCMI Building - Salt Lake City, UT *This project is currently being restored again by Historical Arts & Casting to be placed in the City Creek Development.

Repairing Cast Iron

There are several options when repairing cast iron.  Replacement is the highest level of treatment – and the most expensive.  Other options are to remove the material and repair it in the shop, or make repairs in place.  We recommend that the latter be limited to minor repairs only.  Generally, shop repairs can be much more extensive because of the controlled environment and the more sophisticated equipment available.

Some architects have asked if they can fill hollow castings with concrete or mortar.  We don’t recommend it.  It was done historically on some projects that we have restored and has created all sorts of problems.  We have seen splits in 1-in.-thick columns caused by the pressure of interior rust created by iron in contact with concrete that’s been subject to moisture penetration.

Frequently, imperfections are found in cast iron after it is blasted.  Cold runs and shrinkage can be filled with Bondo and sanded smooth.  Those imperfections that could possibly hold water from a driving rain are the ones that should be filled.   Restorers should be aware that although good castings have a smooth uniform finish, they do not look like extrusions.  We have always believed that the texture of cast iron adds to its character and that too much filling is unnecessary and distracting.

Please check back for part 2 of 2 which will be posted Wednesday June 9th, 2010.

How Much Will It Weigh?

Friday, May 21st, 2010 by Dave Teague
How Much Will It Weigh-Bronze Ingot

Bronze Ingot

Aluminum Ingot

Aluminum Ingot

The job of an estimator can be described with two simple questions: “How much will it cost?” and “How long will it take?”.  Today I would like to break down one part of the answer to the first question.  One significant factor to the question “How much will it cost?” is another question: “How much will it weigh?”  A close approximation of the final weight of any piece of ornamental metalwork is a vital part of its price.  The weight of any piece of metalwork can be determined by multiplying its volume by a constant.  Different constants are used for each different type of metal.  HACI works with Aluminum, Bronze and Cast Iron.  Therefore HACI’s estimator uses constants for each of these materials in the weight calculations during the estimating process.

The Formula.

The formula for determining the weight of any piece of metal work is Weight=Volume*Constant (W=V*C).  Consequently in order to determine the weight of any article, the two elements of the right side of that equation must be known.  Choosing which constant to use is the easy part because it is directly related to the choice of material.  For example, if the final product is to be made from aluminum, then the constant for aluminum (.101 lbs per cubic inch) is used.  Accordingly, if the product is to be bronze, then the bronze constant (.318 lbs per cubic inch) is used. And, necessarily, the choice of Cast Iron requires the final constant be used as the basis for the calculation be used (Cast Iron’s constant is .289 lbs per cubic inch).  Note, while it is true that the different alloys of these materials have different constants associated with each of them, the differences are slight and for the purposes of an estimate of a product’s final weight, the variations fall under the category of “the margin of error” and are inconsequential.  As a side note that people usually find interesting, imagine a cubic foot of material sitting in front of you (that is 12″ wide x 12″ tall x 12″ deep).  That cube has 12×12x12 cubic inches of material within it or 1728 cubic inches.  A cube that size made from Aluminum, Bronze or Cast Iron would weigh in at 174.5 lbs, 549.5 lbs, and 499 lbs respectively.

An Example.

HACIs GR001

HACI's GR001

Notice that the constants above are described in terms of pounds per cubic inch of volume.  One does not have to use the cubic inch as the standard of volume in order to determine the weight of a part.  You could, for example, just as easily use another unit such as the weight per cubic centimeter. HACI’s practice, however, is to use pounds per cubic inch.  Therefore in order to finish the calculation, the part’s volume, in cubic inches, must be determined.  Sometimes calculating the volume is pretty straight forward, other times, though, calculating the volume of a part requires some creative thinking.  Let’s use an air return wall grille as an example of a part whose weight needs to be determined.  Let’s say the grille is 32″ wide x 10″ tall and is to have a thickness of 5/16″ of an inch.  If the part was solid, its volume would be its width (32″) times its height (10″) times its thickness (5/16″) or 100 cubic inches.  The grille, however, is not solid, but rather, it is perforated with a nice design of arches interspersed with a star pattern.  The estimator determines that the percentage of open space in the design is 65%.  This means that the percentage of the grille’s surface that is solid is 35%.  Therefore, the object’s volume is the its (solid) volume times the percent of the object that is solid, or in the case of our example: 100 cubic inches x 35% solid or 35 cubic inches.  The final step, then, in calculating the grille’s weight is multiplying its volume by the constant for the material being used.  In our example, the grille would weigh 11.13 lbs in bronze (35 cubic inches x .318 lbs/cu.in.), or 3.535 lbs in aluminum or 10.115 lbs in cast iron.

Other, more complicated shapes.

HACIs LF090 - Post Light - Merchants Gate, Central Park, New York

HACI's LF090 - Post Light - Merchant's Gate, Central Park, New York

As you can see above, it is not difficult to determine the weight of a regular, rectangular object such as a grille.  But how is the weight of a more complicated object such as a light fixture determined?  Interestingly, the process is really not that more difficult, but it is likely more time consuming.  The only difference in calculating a light fixture’s weight or a grille’s weight is how you start.  In order to find the weight of a more complicated object, break it down into a number of simpler elements, find their weights individually, and then sum up all of those weights to end up with your final result.  This same component breakdown process can be applied to any object, it just takes some time and occasionally some creative thinking to decide on how the overall part should be broken up.

But how much will it weigh in a different material?

Once an object’s weight has been calculated in any one of the three materials, its weight in the other two materials can easily be figured by multiplying the calculated weight by a conversion factor.  For example, a bronze part with a calculated weight of 23.5 lbs would weigh 7.46 lbs in aluminum (bronze weight x conversion factor for bronze to aluminum: .3176) and 21.35 lbs in cast iron (bronze weight  x conversion factor for bronze to cast iron: .9088).  The conversion factor for each material is: the new material’s weight constant divided by the base material’s weight constant.  So for aluminum to bronze, the conversion factor would be .318/.101 or 3.1485.  The table below may be of use to you in your calculations for weights and conversions.

Weight Constants and Conversion Factors
Weight constant Convert From
lbs/Cu.In. Aluminum Bronze Cast Iron
Convert to: Aluminum 0.101 x 0.3176 0.3495
Bronze 0.318 3.1485 x 1.1003
Cast Iron 0.289 2.8614 0.9088 x

The Rebirth Of A Cast Iron Gem (Part 3 of 3)

Monday, May 3rd, 2010 by Robert Baird

Article originally published in the FABRICATOR magazine Nov/Dec 1999 Edition and was written by Robert A. Baird who was the president of Cast Iron Restoration Management and one of the original founders of Historical Arts & Casting, a firm specializing in the design and manufacturing of architectural cast metal ornamentation.

The Rebirth Of A Cast Iron Gem (Part 3 of 3)

A community rallies to the cause of restoring a beloved courthouse.

Roofers install slate tiles on the southwest quadrant of the courthouse roof.

Roofers install slate tiles on the southwest quadrant of the courthouse roof.Replacing the Slate and CopperApproximately 25 percent of the courthouse slate roof was damaged and needed replacement. A determination was made to remove all of the slate, saving the good tiles. The roof was re-sheeted with ¾-inch plywood, dried in, and the new slate laid on one quadrant. All of the original slate was re-laid on the other three quadrants of the roof.

Replacing the Slate and Copper

New copper flashing and gutters were installed for the entire roof system.  Each one of the decks on the central dome was sheathed in copper.  This material was fabricated on site by Vulcan Supply, a sheet metal and roofing contractor from Vermont.

Restoring the Statues

One of the more visible elements of the restoration was the removal and restoration of the copper statues originally built by W.H. Mullens of Salem, Ohio.  These heroic size statues were all removed at the beginning of the project and shipped to Vermont for restoration.  Each statue was disassembled, new copper armatures installed, repairs made, and then refinished.

Prior to installation, the seven statues that adorn the courthouse were displayed to the public at the Miami County Fairgrounds

Prior to installation, the seven statues that adorn the courthouse were displayed to the public at the Miami County Fairgrounds

Little was known about the full level of detail incorporated into the statues until historical photographs were uncovered in Salem, Ohio, in a local historical museum.  These photos not only showed the level of detail in Mullen’s work, but also revealed numerous missing elements from the statues that were re-manufactured.

When the statues arrived back in Troy, Ohio, they were exhibited at the fairgrounds.  Thousands of county residents came to get a close look at the figures that had stood as sentinels and watched over their community for 100 years.  Special workshops were held for school students to learn, see, and experience the skills required to repair and create this wonderful repoussé metalwork.

On the central dome, four large cast iron and glass clock faces were removed during the restoration.  The original movement to these clocks had been modified over the years and was not original. The weight driven mechanism had been converted to electricity and the striker for a large bronze bell was disconnected.  Because of the reliability of new electric clocks, the old movement mechanism was replaced; however, the bell was restored and connected to the new clock.  The old movement was put in a permanent display on the main floor of the courthouse.

Exterior Lighting

With the restoration nearing completion, Heapy Engineering, a local electrical engineering firm, was given the challenge to design exterior lighting for the courthouse.  They also helped develop a lightning protection plan for the susceptible metal roof.

The two-year restoration plan was completed on schedule and just in time for a large celebration on the July 4th, sponsored by the county commissioners.  The courthouse was rededicated with over 34,000 in attendance.  The gala event was complete with a laser light show, great food, and tours of the courthouse.

Miami County Courthouse, Troy, OH

Miami County Courthouse, Troy, OH

I have come to realize that a project of this size and scope cannot be done without the efforts of a lot of people.  This particular project would never have been so successful without the support and efforts of the many professionals, community leaders, and volunteers who lent their support.  Truly, their training and expertise brought about the rebirth of this old gem, Miami’s Pride.

Part 1 of 3

Part 2 of 3

The Rebirth Of A Cast Iron Gem (Part 2 of 3)

Wednesday, April 28th, 2010 by Robert Baird

Article originally published in the FABRICATOR magazine Nov/Dec 1999 Edition and was written by Robert A. Baird who was the president of Cast Iron Restoration Management and one of the original founders of Historical Arts & Casting, a firm specializing in the design and manufacturing of architectural cast metal ornamentation.

The Rebirth Of A Cast Iron Gem (Part 2 of 3)

A community rallies to the cause of restoring a beloved courthouse.

By Robert A. Baird

Time to Restore

Prior to starting the actual restoration, 43,000 pounds of pigeon waste and other debris were removed from the attic.  Scaffolding was erected from the ground for the pavilions but was cantilevered off the masonry around the corner domes.  Scaffolding was also set around the central dome.  An elevator lift was set up from the ground to the rooftop allow for the movement of material to and from the building.

A view from the inside shows the riveted iron structure and cast iron panels on the central dome.

A view from the inside shows the riveted iron structure and cast iron panels on the central dome.

Dismantling

With the site ready to start work, the laborious task of removing every piece of cast iron from the top of the central dome was started.  Each piece of iron was documented, catalogued, and then later inspected and numbered during the removal process.  Severely corroded material was scrapped and all usable material was removed from the site to be sandblasted and repainted.  Over 15,000 cast iron parts ranging from a few pounds to several hundred pounds were removed.  The demolition and installation crews grew to as many as 25 men and the work went year round after the first winter.

Restoring the Structure & Iron

The beauty of cast iron structures from this period is their simplicity.  The Miami County Courthouse was no exception, with a simple riveted iron structure or framework laced together with tie rods supporting the cast iron skin.  The combination of the cast iron bolted to the riveted iron structure created a very sound roof support system.  For the most part, the structure was in good condition and needed only to be cleaned, painted, and some minor reinforcement.  All of this work was completed in the field.

Connecting the restored cast iton panels to the central dome.

Connecting the restored cast iton panels to the central dome.

The restoration program for the cast iron was quite a bit more involved than the structure.  Over 50 percent of the cast iron had to be replaced, which meant new patterns were needed and new components cast.  Over 700 patterns had to be manufactured to produce the thousands of cast iron parts required.  Because shrinkage was critical, old parts could not be used as patterns.  Historical Arts and Casting had the responsibility of not only restoring the old parts but also manufacturing the new iron and installation.

One of the key elements of the restoration was the cleaning and painting of the cast iron, which ultimately would provide long-term protection for the iron.  Tnemec Corp. was very helpful in assisting with technical support and providing testing throughout the course of the project.  Their four-part paint system included zinc rich primers, intermediate high build epoxy, and two finish coats of urethane.  Cast iron parts were sandblasted and pre-finished prior to delivery to the job site.  After the installation, additional coats of paint were applied in the field.

The second major consideration during the cast iron restoration was the waterproofing.  The reason for the cast iron failure in the first place was the lack of adequate waterproofing.  We were confident that if we focused on waterproofing issues and thoroughly resolved them we could dramatically increase the life of the cast iron.  When new parts were required, we tried to improve on how they were built, adding flanges and lap joints to improve their ability to shed water.  Thousands of linear feet of vertical and horizontal joints were caulked with Dow Corning’s silicone system.

The last installment will be posted on Monday, May 3rd, 2010. Stay tuned.

Part 1 of 3

The Rebirth of A Cast Iron Gem (Part 1 of 3)

Wednesday, April 21st, 2010 by Robert Baird

Article originally published in the FABRICATOR magazine Nov/Dec 1999 Edition and was written by Robert A. Baird who was the president of Cast Iron Restoration Management and one of the original founders of Historical Arts & Casting, a firm specializing in the design and manufacturing of architectural cast metal ornamentation.

The Rebirth Of A Cast Iron Gem (Part 1 of 3)

A community rallies to the cause of restoring a beloved courthouse.

By Robert A. Baird

Perhaps once in a lifetime one gets a chance to be involved in a project that will change the face of a community, touching the hearts and homes of the local residents and leaving a lasting legacy for years to come.  When that project centers around a craft or skill that one has trained their entire life to perform, an indelible sense of gratification is left to linger.  Such is the case with the restoration of the Mimi County Courthouse and the many people involved in its restoration.

Richard Baird, Presidenct of Historical Arts & Casting, Inc., prepares a condition survey of the cast iron prior to restoration.

Richard Baird, President of Historical Arts & Casting, Inc., prepares a condition survey of the cast iron prior to restoration.

In 1888, the construction of the Miami County Courthouse was completed.  Commissioned at a cost of $400,000, this Greco-Roman courthouse was different from others built in Ohio during the same period.  Joseph Warren Yost’s ambition design resembled the U.S. Capitol in a smaller scale, with sandstone and limestone walls topped by five domes and four pavilions.  Each pavilion supports heroic allegorical statues, with Justice situated in prominence atop the central dome.  The entire roof system, including the domes and pavilions, was built of riveted iron and clad with an elaborate cast iron skin.  This cast iron construction, indicative of the time period, would become the largest restoration of its type in the country and possibly the world.

The location of the courthouse was determined after years of bickering between two Ohio communities, Troy and Piqua.  What is termed the “Courthouse War,” was won by Troy.  The cornerstone was laid in 1885 with completion in the spring of 1888.  The new courthouse was the pride of the community, rising to a height of 175 feet on the banks of the Miami River.

After 90 years of heavy use, the courthouse underwent an interior restoration in 1982.  By late 1989 the building’s exterior was rapidly deteriorating.  Water penetration into the decorative cast iron accelerated its corrosion, threatening to destroy recently renovated interior courtrooms.

Late in 1989 our firm, Historical Arts and Casting, received a call from John Ruetschle’s office, a local architect that had been given the task to locate consultants with expertise in restoring cast iron structures.  After visiting the site we prepared a comprehensive proposal for the restoration of the cast iron.  Our proposal included detailed measured drawings, a thorough photographic survey, a preliminary specification for restoration work, and an estimated cost proposal to complete the restoration.

The county commissioners were excited about the prospect of doing such a thorough restoration, but were set back by

Once the dome was partially dismantled, it was possible to access the riveted iron framework.

Once the dome was partially dismantled, it was possible to access the riveted iron framework.

the estimated $4.6 million price tag.  Six years passed while a plan formalized, requiring annual visits to the site to inspect the condition of the cast iron.  Each year the iron was visibly worse, forcing mandatory stopgap emergency repairs.

With tremendous support from local residents, a plan was developed by the Miami County Board of Commissioners to temporarily raise the local sales tax to fund the restoration.  Schools throughout the county became involved with the project by implementing courthouse history and restoration processes into their curriculum.  The students also wrote articles and created artwork published by local newspapers, which also increased public awareness.

Scaffolding surrounds the central dome and southeast corner dome.

Scaffolding surrounds the central dome and southeast corner dome.

In 1995, Cast Iron Restoration Management, a construction management team, was retained by the county to develop and manage the entire restoration program.  They completed all of the construction documents, including drawings and specifications, for the long awaited restoration.  In the spring of 1996, Shook Building Group, a local construction company, was awarded the primary restoration contract.  Costs for the project rose to over $7.2 million as the scope of the project increased.

The restoration program for the courthouse included dismantling the cast iron from the five domes down to the iron structure, restoring the structure, removing all of the applied cast iron ornament on the four pavilions, restoring all of the cast iron, replacing the slate roof, replacing the copper flashing and clad decks, replacing the windows, restoring a four faced clock tower, new exterior lighting, and restoring seven heroic size copper statues.

On the outset of the project, numerous challenges were faced to maintain the two-year construction schedule and keep the courthouse fully functional during the restoration.

Check back next Wednesday (04/28/2010)  for the next installment.

An Architectural Facelift – Clad vs Solid

Friday, April 16th, 2010 by Dick Jensen

Fava Fruit/Blaustein Building - Baltimore, MD

Fava Fruit/Blaustein Building - Baltimore, MD

If you have ever walked down the main street of a large city you can play the game of clad versus solid. There may be only a few who even care to look at the decorative metal of each building, but for those who do it becomes evident quickly as to how the quality of construction can change. Clad facing has definite limitation as to how decorative the store front can be. It usually says to me that this store front is less than. Less than what you ask, less than it could have been. If you look at a store front and it has solid extrusion and decorative cast metal it says I am total quality and complete. I was talking to an architect once about this and he put it this way, each store front howls at the passer by.

ZCMI Center - Salt Lake City, UT

ZCMI Center - Salt Lake City, UT

It howls as to how much time and effort was put into the store front which is the face of the building. The face of the building is much the same as the face of a human being. It’s the first thing you see and leaves an impression that is hard to overcome no matter what the rest of the building has to offer. It seems to me that if you are going to go to all the effort to build a multi million dollar building the last thing you want to do is put a simple lack luster clad face on it. I would think that you would want to have the architect spend particular care as to making sure the face says I am total complete quality. I am beautiful. So the next time you find yourself walking down your city main street take a look as to how much effort was put into the face of your city.